From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id +HidN7RUTmCEHgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:23:48 +0000 Received: from aspmx2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 4ANhM7RUTmA1XgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:23:48 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx2.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E70D413525 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 19:23:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53522 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLVP1-0005Ay-1x for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 14:23:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLVJj-0001Dx-6L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 14:18:19 -0400 Received: from forward105j.mail.yandex.net ([5.45.198.248]:43503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLVJg-0001Rs-Fx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 14:18:18 -0400 Received: from sas1-a9957863b207.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas1-a9957863b207.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c08:f200:0:640:a995:7863]) by forward105j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6B768B20367; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 21:18:06 +0300 (MSK) Received: from sas8-6bf5c5d991b2.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas8-6bf5c5d991b2.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c1b:2a1f:0:640:6bf5:c5d9]) by sas1-a9957863b207.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id INgCQ0nxXT-I6IOAu3b; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 21:18:06 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1615745886; bh=wvRAQSdcL8xv4G7hXVIQXpr6TJAJaUTpfeUPT3NHC2U=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Cc:Cc:Date:References; b=jlyfa5wlhG6bqvXvwpSh+OeRC+MpnA8pAwoHuD+XcOgLQSyM6Cxu3j8jjyq8O0V73 YzfoUmdDdCUYcx23rtfnX7XiApG8q1kBXj8vIBp2e1bf9029JfULyBagSAi2SYm2Y2 F9TCwah05VT25siXayCwf8tvuBR9tCmL4mTn3hEQ= Received: by sas8-6bf5c5d991b2.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id uLUYTTvq2H-I5IeM6Eg; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 21:18:05 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) From: Colin Baxter To: Timothy Subject: Re: Why is there no inline-src syntax highlighting? References: <87a6r6avgg.fsf@gmail.com> <871rchu6ep.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:18:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <871rchu6ep.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Sun, 14 Mar 2021 15:00:30 +0000") Message-ID: <87tupdlhur.fsf@yandex.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAGQAAAAeBAMAAAAodabAAAAAB3RJTUUH1wQdAAY04/L8hgAA AAlwSFlzAAAewQAAHsEBw2lUUwAAAARnQU1BAACxjwv8YQUAAAASUExURc7OzpwAAAAAAP////8A AGNj/2aqqTQAAAA8SURBVHjaYzA2NnEBAmdj01D8wNgYpM7F2JiBgYFREAgEGJiU8AMGBpA6QaCG UVtGbRm1ZdSWUVsGjS0Aq20lJnMawnkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.45.198.248; envelope-from=m43cap@yandex.com; helo=forward105j.mail.yandex.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: , org-mode-email Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1615746228; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=wvRAQSdcL8xv4G7hXVIQXpr6TJAJaUTpfeUPT3NHC2U=; b=Qlo4qOuDrEyzw4LtkNFSYjM6j1PzvmZ9GMzDYHWa14jkmgtlGlzjAIhmONdPDEAeonD3Yb J8GLsDXhDaSVFkqg5dlwMAKnyaolgLU3Mo99AyKEnpCiuVwb4aSOswFPJVn87Hak4uOwTj zYHvsMUj97W2JmrX/xTUay1/DS+jTEcAhw7192W5TbiLJ2/EtHUAo8KXRigxnJfiOaFbfa kKx+GhtSIyzTDDBzZ3yGosfNITxZ+AdgSqysxzsOclQ+dAz8gg/DnQUuuOWlCF2+yJHFo3 3VCmDSwVBtGBGsUBXVyk9jhgMdjdyYf1PW0dOGzMHQDCkf2IuuFOLuIFd8CyRQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1615746228; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rgGdjySd/uo53Ai7qlnnvddqvqVhu9UmwDGc5mrIyf9fYof3uX/aXigZmuNKl2URxw0T6c fTbBaPelnqOW1ZuHsKFq0RZNmTZRo+4JZHqfYEhwOZpTrE4j89cxzK0p6ELVrkCLz/v7tQ 3Yzt2QdM4JwEaQiItgOUVNM/J0ipxPtVDMukVgRZ8USsGrLjlTFEgzgPqwE1auuKvy8uet ZyLmtEWeZrNMGw70OyjJ5xnKBo9uFKmRwiIPkqpYLaGS/2jHjAgbQiouNtZdIuh5pW+6M0 VqBaYb/cJgPb+eo4fOnFUthmMMpeWiy6Nc83T33vQvzNlxS9PhuZLkHKNTjnHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx2.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yandex.com header.s=mail header.b=jlyfa5wl; spf=pass (aspmx2.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.30 Authentication-Results: aspmx2.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yandex.com header.s=mail header.b=jlyfa5wl; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=yandex.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx2.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E70D413525 X-Spam-Score: -0.30 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: AF3BEc7/+uzG >>>>> Eric S Fraga writes: > On Sunday, 14 Mar 2021 at 18:19, Timothy wrote: >> It's great how #+begin_src blocks support 'native' syntax >> highlighting, but inline src_lang{} blocks don't seem to be >> formatted/highlighted at all. >> >> I'm wondering why this is. Might anyone know? > Possibly because nobody had done it before? Or maybe it slows > things down too much. I don't know but I would definitely be > interested in having this feature; your screenshot looks good. > -- : Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.4-254-g37749c There is this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20309842/how-to-syntax-highlight-for-org-mode-inline-source-code-src-lang Best wishes, Colin Baxter.