From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Bremner Subject: clocktable and ISO week Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:24:57 -0400 Message-ID: <87skn48ms6.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca> Reply-To: David Bremner Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRvQc-00016Z-TG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:25:03 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRvQb-00015J-59 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:25:01 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58258 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRvQa-00015A-SL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:25:00 -0500 Received: from pivot.cs.unb.ca ([131.202.240.57]:48215) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRvQa-0004tK-M5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:25:00 -0500 Received: from bremner by pivot.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LRvQZ-0007nZ-59 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:24:59 -0400 Received: from bremner (helo=pivot.cs.unb.ca) by pivot.cs.unb.ca with local-esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LRvQX-0007nR-QI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:24:57 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I have a clocktable that begins like this. #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 2 :block 2009-W05 :scope agenda-with-archives Clock summary at [2009-01-27 Tue 17:15], for week 2009-W04. [contents snipped] #+END: Whatever week I put in :block, it puts one less in the title. It seems actually gather the clock data from the right week, but the title is wrong? Or I misunderstand something as usual :-). I tried emacs22 and emacs23 (emacs-snapshot on debian) and org-mode 6.19b (6.17c was the same IIRC). d