From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jemarch@gnu.org Subject: Re: [OT] Emacs for email? Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:31:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87skbtnxrq.wl%jemarch@gnu.org> References: <87aay17m3z.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87iqcp3ai5.wl%jemarch@gnu.org> <878wdlh2sr.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFs92-0007dj-Fv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:33:36 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFs8x-0007ZK-AH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:33:36 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40837 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFs8w-0007Yw-Se for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:33:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878wdlh2sr.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric S Fraga Cc: Keith Lancaster , Org Mode List These and the others you will find allude to this approach fitting in with the more general GTD view, which is why org-mode is critical (for me) to get this working. I actually do something similar, but keeping the physical emails. I maintain (in wanderlust) an Inbox folder and a General folder to hold my emails. I process the Inbox in a GTD style. For each message: 1) If it is not interesting, delete. 2) If it is useful for reference, archive it in the ref system and move the email to General, without storing any link to it in my reference system. 3) If it is an email that I can answer quickly, do it and move the email to General. 4) If it is an email that I want to answer but that requires some previous investigation/action, I move the email to General and, using remember, create a new NEXT item in my todo.org. The NEXT item has an hyperlink pointing to the email in the General mbox. Now, I wonder if is it possible to implement the previous system without having to maintain the General mbox (that is huge). It is clear that I could simply remove the emails in 2) after archiving its contents in my reference system. But, what about the emails in 3) and 4)? How do you store an email that you will eventually answer if not in an mbox?