From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: dynamically calculated timestamps? Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:42:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87sk1rzs0d.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47919 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrIUl-0005XV-9G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:43:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrIUj-0003Qj-Qo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:42:59 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:37446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrIUj-0003Qf-I9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:42:57 -0400 Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so870735eyh.0 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:42:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Matt Price's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:14:26 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matt Price Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Org makes it so easy to (re)schedule a task that I'm not sure dynamic relative timestamps are not a bit too much (even if playing with this idea is fun, I agree.) -- Bastien