From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Noorul Islam K M Subject: Re: bug with spaces in regexp search Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:10:38 +0530 Message-ID: <87sk0vzquh.fsf@noorul.maa.corp.collab.net> References: <87sk11ufdq.fsf@noorul.maa.corp.collab.net> <87d3s0iekj.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38590 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P06Tn-00072e-Lp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:42:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P06Tm-0002nv-KO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:42:23 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:41865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P06Tm-0002nn-Eg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:42:22 -0400 Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so7259601iwn.0 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:42:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:04:08 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: David Maus , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Samuel Wales writes: > The bug has been fixed, so the following is moot. > > Ah, but he didn't . :) Hence my question. :) > > I appreciated the effort to help, but I was wondering what he was > trying to say, because he used strings instead of regexps and he used > different settings for both variables. The bug was with regexps (i.e. > {...}) and not strings. > I tried to reproduce it and I think I missed the regexp part. I am sorry about that. > In other words, he did not attempt to reproduce the bug, but instead > changed 3 conditions back to a known-working state. It was not a > surprise that it worked. :) > > But, again, I appreciated the effort to help. > > I was unable to type more than a few words at the time I asked. I > hope this clarifies conclusively. Your one liner reply to the mail confused me and I again typed in the same thing. If you could have typed in the first paragraph in this mail as your initial reply I could have tried with regexp. Since now that Carsten has fixed the bug and it has not been ignored because of my mistake, I think you are happy. Thanks and Regards Noorul