From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: "# <>" should stick to the following text Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 14:44:53 +0930 Message-ID: <87sjfctvw2.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <8662c9rqtq.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca> <87397dgg9a.fsf@gmail.com> <4141.1336352894@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRGHo-00046r-Ba for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 01:15:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRGHm-0002BP-J8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 01:15:03 -0400 Received: from tx2ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.11]:21378 helo=tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRGHm-00024R-Cz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 01:15:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4141.1336352894@alphaville> (Nick Dokos's message of "Sun, 6 May 2012 21:08:14 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3Futf-8=3FQ?= =?us-ascii?Q?=3FFran=3DC3=3DA7ois=3F=3D?= Pinard , Nicolas Goaziou Nick Dokos writes: > Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> Hello, >>=20 >> Fran=C3=A7ois Pinard writes: >>=20 >> > I'm not sure I'm using "# <>" correctly, but my feeling is that it >> > should stick to the following text in various Org operations. Let's s= ay >> > I have something like (as I think it): >>=20 >> "# <>" is a deprecated construct. I suggest to avoid bothering with >> it. >>=20 >>=20 > > With all due respect, that is not a satisfactory answer. I, for one (or > for two: Fran=C3=A7ois would surely appreciate it too), would appreciate a > pointer to the deprecation notice (I don't remember seeing one but that > doesn't mean much), and a pointer (if different) to whatever construct > is supposed to replace it. > > Thanks, > Nick > Isn't the deprecation the need to put the <> in a comment (i.e. #)? The angle bracket syntax remains, I thought. But maybe I also am confused as to the current direction this is taking... --=20 : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.1.50.1 : using Org release_7.8.09-529-g035ab3.dirty