From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [bug] [new-exporter] #+includes in non-exported regions do not
 work
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 08:51:36 +0000
Message-ID: <87sj8xu0dj.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <87mwz63mjx.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <871ugi6dih.fsf@ed.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47071)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1TSljs-0007Fu-Th
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:34:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1TSljp-0000OK-1k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:34:32 -0400
Received: from tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.14]:55883
	helo=tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1TSljo-0000O5-RJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:34:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <871ugi6dih.fsf@ed.ac.uk> (Myles English's message of "Sun, 28
	Oct 2012 11:29:26 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Myles English <mylesenglish@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Myles English <mylesenglish@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> You have:
>
>   #+include: uml.org
>
> I think it should be:
>
>   #+include: "uml.org"

Indeed it should be, or at least for the new exporter.  Thanks for
pointing this out.

There is still a bug in that the exporter should fail more gracefully?

The question of structural interpretation remains: should the file be
included if it is found within a not-to-be-exported headline?  This is,
at least for me, unexpected behaviour based on previous experience with
the old exporter.  Now, from C programming and so on, the behaviour in
the new exporter is reasonable; however, as there is no way to
optionally included material from another file, I prefer the behaviour
of the old exporter.

Thanks again,
eric

-- 
: Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D
: in Emacs 24.2.50.1 and Org release_7.9.2-406-g2c78ca-git