From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: coroa@online.de (Jonas =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B6rsch?=) Subject: Re: org-sync doesn't work with recent org-element.el Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:13:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87sj792gr9.fsf@online.de> References: <874njtc39x.fsf@online.de> <876247nxgo.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40465) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjQsX-0003If-8L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:44:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjQsT-00079B-2M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:44:20 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjQOy-0001Sz-AH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:13:48 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjQP9-0006b2-5Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:13:59 +0100 Received: from dslb-188-103-124-219.pools.arcor-ip.net ([188.103.124.219]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:13:59 +0100 Received: from coroa by dslb-188-103-124-219.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:13:59 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org hi all, hi aurélien, then, i suppose the answer to my main question, whether someone has started updating org-sync, is a no and i'll thus try. i'm not too proficient in elisp yet, so any hints of a clean transition are appreciated. i plan to alter any parts, which read/write cons lists (i mean those ( key . value ) pairs which used to go under the :properties key) to node-property elements directly. if you think a bit of that chore could be abstracted away in a function, let me know. cheers, jonas