From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: OT, but not really: todays XKCD Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:28:24 +0530 Message-ID: <87sj51hbwf.fsf@gmail.com> References: <9C4C997C2CA6AA488CBC8C9E56E764EE26450A98@MBX04.uva.nl> <87liavcfov.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw12c1j5.fsf@yagnesh.org> <87vc9yftxn.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehgld4vm.fsf@yagnesh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5GNs-0004ii-Df for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:59:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5GNm-0006E6-7y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:58:56 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:57077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5GNl-0006Dq-V9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:58:50 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fa10so101017pad.41 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 05:58:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ehgld4vm.fsf@yagnesh.org> (Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:43:41 +0900") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala writes: > Dear Jambunathan, > >> If I say Yagnesh has made zero contributions to Tamil Poetry does it >> amount to attacking you. Think about it. > > Sorry to say, that is very bad comparison. Seems you are trying to nullify > Bastien's efforts. You are blaming me for what I didn't say. How bad can it be. Re-read the mail I sent. Now contest my statement: "Bastien has minimal contribution to new export framework or exporters." Hint: There is a (subtle) difference between: "I am not eating Oranges" and "I am fasting". I will give you one more attempt. Try again. See whether you can convince me. > Though I don't want to quantify, here is one data point, > > > > > > > > > > I wonder how much contribution(s) sum up zero+ for you. But personally for me > a contributor doesn't need to add code commits. I start counting from a mere > up-voter on a thread > > , I consider > anybody a contributor who has at least upvoted pro fsf/org thread. > > > Thanks., --