From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: [ANN] outorg.el -- reverse Org-Babel Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:11:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87sj513wex.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87mwvabeuk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5Pwk-00043N-Li for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:11:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5Pwj-0000bC-8d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:11:34 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56911) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5Pwj-0000az-21 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:11:33 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U5Pwz-0003sC-Nw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:11:49 +0100 Received: from e178056063.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.56.63]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:11:49 +0100 Received: from tjolitz by e178056063.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:11:49 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Samuel Wales writes: > One suggestion: what about optionally allowing you to keep your Org > notes in Org? That would allow all Org features. > > You'd do it by putting a specially-formatted Org ID in the comment, > and then you have a key that bounces back and forth. > > ;;; $[id 123451243512345] > > Then in Org you have that ID as a property. > > That way you can choose whether to have your documentation in the > source file using Org syntax or in Org. I'm not sure I fully understand this, but working with 'org-id' would definitely have been another option. Maybe even in combination with dynamic blocks? -- cheers, Thorsten