From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 16:38:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87sj19iz62.fsf@pank.eu> References: <87hahrmabq.fsf@pank.eu> <20130525170322.GA734@kenny.local> <87bo7zlzln.fsf_-_@pank.eu> <874ndqn42e.fsf@pank.eu> <20130526105814.GB716@kenny.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60599) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ugc6C-0006vL-I0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 10:39:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ugc6A-0000Xq-L2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 10:39:04 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ugc6A-0000XY-AP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 10:39:02 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ugc69-0007rt-8E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 16:39:01 +0200 Received: from dynamic-adsl-94-39-217-165.clienti.tiscali.it ([94.39.217.165]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 16:39:01 +0200 Received: from rasmus by dynamic-adsl-94-39-217-165.clienti.tiscali.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 16:39:01 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Viktor Rosenfeld writes: > I'm also not a big fan of the title defaulting to the filename. But I > think it is a minor issue. What I think is quite useful is setting the > subject to the headline of the exported subtree. Wouldn't we also lose > this if subject is nil? Without knowing the details wrt title: We can control for a special case and call the vanilla title function otherwise. How easy it is to big up this special case? I don't know. –Rasnmus -- Vote for proprietary math!