From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Org-mode and continuing BBDB compatibility Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:47:18 -0400 Message-ID: <87sivuqm15.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> References: <874n8a4dvx.fsf@aura.christopherculver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYOG9-0006KT-2k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:47:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYOG3-00047N-Cs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:47:37 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYOG3-00047H-5h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:47:31 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VYOG2-0002T0-0D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:47:30 +0200 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:47:29 +0200 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:47:29 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Christopher Culver writes: > I am using org-mode version 20131021 and the latest checkout of the > bbdb3 git repository. Although I have the following lines in my main > .org file: > > * Anniversaries > :PROPERTIES: > :CATEGORY: Anniv > :END: > %%(org-bbdb-anniversaries) > > I do not see anniversaries from my .bbdb file in the agenda. I know that > some work was done in the past with making org-mode compatible with > bbdb3, but are the two projects no longer compatible, or do I probably > have some other problem on my end? > I believe the %% construct is recognized only at the beginning of a line: try deleting the white space in front. Nick