From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Exporting markdown specific string
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:30:09 +0100
Message-ID: <87sit1cpq6.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CA+vqiLHJxAYEbN2fvdMw+n=PfiiMdHecBnKUKWcfNKxXZjXyug@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k3efzmpg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fvp31rfp.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87bnzrvsoe.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42592)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1W08NZ-0007ux-NU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 06:30:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1W08NU-0003v6-9Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 06:29:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87bnzrvsoe.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sun, 05 Jan
	2014 07:39:13 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode Mailinglist <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Ista Zahn <istazahn@gmail.com>

Hello,

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> #+HTML and the likes are special shortcuts for historical export
>>> backends, we don't plan to add more.
>>
>> What? Every back-end introduces its own specific keyword
>> (#+beamer: #+ascii ...). I just added them (#+md: and #+markdown:) for
>> md back-end.
>
> Ah, my mistake.
>
> (I had a memory of a conversation about #+HTML looked too ad hoc,
> and in my memories you convinced me that we should not add more of
> these keywords.  But maybe you didn't convince me then!)

I don't like them much (as they are redundant) so it's well possible we
had this conversation. For some reason they now exist, for the worse or
the better, in every core back-end.

Though, they are not mandatory for new back-ends. Only documentation can
tell if such a keyword exists for a given back-end (which reminds me
that the recently introduced keywords are not documented yet).


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou