From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [BUG] superscripts exported as subscripts by ox-ascii Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 23:55:23 -0400 Message-ID: <87siojli6s.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20140508115105.GA2711@chitra.no-ip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48277) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WibuV-0000rD-Oe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 23:55:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WibuO-0003XO-99 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 23:55:47 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WibuN-0003SI-Us for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 23:55:40 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WibuM-0000Y4-0X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 05:55:38 +0200 Received: from pool-98-110-160-12.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([98.110.160.12]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 05:55:38 +0200 Received: from ndokos by pool-98-110-160-12.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 05:55:38 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Suvayu Ali writes: > Hi, > > When exporting the following snippets, superscripts are exported as > subscripts by the ascii exporter. > > Org src: > > - B⁺ → D(K_{s}ππ)K⁺, B → D(K_{s}KK)K⁺, > - CPV in B^{±} → D(K_{s}K^{±}π^{∓})K^{±}, and B^{±} → > D(K_{s}K^{∓}π^{±})K^{±}, > > Exported text: > > • B⁺ → D(K_{s}ππ)K⁺, B → D(K_{s}KK)K⁺, > • CPV in B_{±} → D(K_{s}K_{±}π_{∓})K_{±}, and B_{±} → > D(K_{s}K_{∓}π_{±})K_{±}, > > Unfortunately I noticed this after I sent the exported text to a bunch > of my collaborators! Thankfully we work for the same institute :). > I pushed the obvious fix for this to master. -- Nick