From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: exporter bindings in agenda Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 17:08:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87sio1lukq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ppj6hxg6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnUbu-0008Gt-5a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 11:08:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnUbo-0007kr-3x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 11:08:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:60649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnUbn-0007ke-SG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 11:08:40 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hi2so10061369wib.0 for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:08:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Greg Troxel's message of "Thu, 22 May 2014 07:53:33 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Greg Troxel Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Greg, Greg Troxel writes: > But I can deal or change my own bindings, so the question is really > about what the ensemble of current and future users will find more > intuitive. Yes -- let them speak. I don't find it intuitive to have C-c C-e in agenda trying to do something sensible, except for exporting the result of C-x C-w, but probably other users feel otherwise. -- Bastien