From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-capture-place-item better alignment for new lists.
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:49:09 +0200
Message-ID: <87sij02dnu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <20141007105611.GC3627@embecosm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58388)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XbV7y-0006VP-Ui
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:48:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XbV7q-00083o-SO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:48:34 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:36566)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XbV7q-00083f-MJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:48:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20141007105611.GC3627@embecosm.com> (Andrew Burgess's message of
	"Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:56:11 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> writes:

> Creating an entry in org-capture-templates of type item adds entries
> into a list, however, if the list is empty then the first list item
> will be indented to depth 0 (so hard on the left) like this:
>
> * Top Level
> ** Second Level
> - item #1
> - item #2
> - item #3
>
> I prefer to indent content, including lists, to a level matching the
> parent, so something like this:
>
> * Top Level
> ** Second Level
>    - item #1
>    - item #2
>    - item #3
>
> The patch below changes org-capture-place-item so that, when starting
> a new list, the items are indented as in the second example above.

Thanks for the patch.

However, this behaviour is wrong when `org-adapt-indentation' is nil.

It is better to use `org-indent-line' than hard-coding

  (1+ (org-current-level)).


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou