From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve success message from org-remove-file. Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:35:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87sih6mby7.fsf@selenimh.mobile.lan> References: <87vbm433gm.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com> <873897ptz7.fsf@selenimh.mobile.lan> <87ioi3p8dl.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xtary-0005z4-FW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:34:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xtarp-0008Jt-1m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:34:50 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:47212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xtaro-0008JF-Rb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:34:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ioi3p8dl.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com> (Karl Fogel's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:12:06 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Karl Fogel writes: > I didn't include "TINYCHANGE" on purpose. The guidelines say: > > | If the change is a minor change made by a committer without > | copyright assignment to the FSF, the commit message should also > | contain the cookie TINYCHANGE (anywhere in the message). When we > | later produce the ChangeLog file for Emacs, the change will be > | marked appropriately. > > However, I *do* have copyright assignment on file with the FSF (for > Emacs), so I interpreted the above as meaning I shouldn't include > "TINYCHANGE". What is the right thing to do here? Nothing. I didn't know you had copyright assignment. I updated contributors list accordingly. Regards,