From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: extra paragraph in image export?
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:40:32 +0100
Message-ID: <87sho8ztgv.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <CAN_Dec9f0-pD2igeDW7rzU29Re36TML70c0Yyqrv3JhAFVp3sg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87lgu3b5c8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41445)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1cVxbV-0007Iu-Q6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 04:41:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1cVxbR-0001EL-2G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 04:41:29 -0500
Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=33340 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1cVxbQ-0001Dt-RU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 04:41:24 -0500
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1cVxav-0001V0-EF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:40:53 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

>> with org-html-html5-fancy is non-nil, images are exported with something
>> like this code:
>>
>> <figure>
>> <p><img src="https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/proof_2x.png" alt="proof_2x.png"
>> class="fragment (appear) visible current-fragment"
>> data-fragment-index="0"></p>
>> </figure>

I'm not an expert of HTML either.  However, the "p" tag inside the
"figure" is uncommon looking a bit on the example usages online.  Thus, I
agree with Matt that it should probably not be there.

> I'm not well-versed enough in HTML to answer this, but, from Org POV,
> there should be a difference between
>
>   A paragraph
>
>   #+caption: foo
>   [[block-image.png]]
>
>   Another paragraph
>
>
> and
>
>   A paragraph with an [[inline-image.png]] and some text following.
>
> Would removing the <p> tag blur the difference between the two examples
> above ?

(I hope I understand your concern correctly).

AFAIK, the CSS selector still differs so on the output side they are not
alike.  I.e. the former is "figure>img" the other is a "p>img".  Aside: If
anything, removing the "p" tag inside the figure would make it easier to
handle images.

Rasmus

-- 
Vote for proprietary math!