From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Welle Subject: Re: Table formula from code block Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:14:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87sho8zgs6.fsf@luisa.c0t0d0s0.de> References: <87ziighlqi.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87a8aghedy.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59901) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cW1rx-0003Oc-VV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:14:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cW1ru-0007kj-RA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:14:45 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:49569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cW1ru-0007kI-He for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:14:42 -0500 Received: from stella.c0t0d0s0.de ([89.204.139.7]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M0yaB-1cEmvZ1xvT-00v73c for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:14:38 +0100 Received: from Stella (stella.c0t0d0s0.de [192.168.42.1]) by stella.c0t0d0s0.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324CBC45FC for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:14:33 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87a8aghedy.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:43:37 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Eric S Fraga writes: > On Tuesday, 24 Jan 2017 at 10:52, Michael Welle wrote: >> Eric S Fraga writes: >>> Works fine for me with relatively recent org from git. >> that's strange. I pulled last sunday. > > Well, I have just this minute updated and tried again. It still works > for me. ohschockschwerenot, I found it. I set org-confirm-babel-evaluate to a function that does look at the body of the code block and then decides if it should be executed without confirmation or not. I'm not sure, why that is a problem. In the case of the examples, the function returns t and that is the default value of o-c-b-evaluate. Regards hmw