From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: function for inserting a block Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:20:57 -0700 Message-ID: <87she94cra.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <877exghblx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bmllk5xy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878tgmwwsa.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po9q2e8k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tvyyvpst.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fuaiz069.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lgk9eo4d.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fuahxxvs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r2u1cuwj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87infdctzq.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k1zsbizs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k1zp4rxj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871slx4j6p.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2ttoq5k.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871sltst0t.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3o14cul.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6n26-0004gB-GO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:25:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6n23-000555-8o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:25:26 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=37068 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6n22-00054U-Mk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:25:23 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e6n1k-0003IQ-Jo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 02:25:04 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Eric Abrahamsen writes: >> >>> Kaushal Modi writes: >>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, 5:43 PM Kaushal Modi wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> @Eric: I believe you were sort of onboard with this suggestion, just gated by a doubt if this actually can make into master. >>> >>> In principle yes, I agree it's odd to have two completely different >>> systems for essentially doing the same thing. >> >> I agree, but I don't like much the easy template system. We're basically >> re-inventing the wheel. Better solutions already exist. Some of them >> even ship with Emacs. >> >> I think the function could replace the template system altogether. It's >> easy enough to mimic current system with, e.g., Yasnippet. > > In that case, would you be more in favor of a keymap-plus-subkey system, > or a keymap-plus-prompt system? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I mean, keybinding-plus-prompt...