From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 00:33:14 +0100
Message-ID: <87shahtzr9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87o9l6uou5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<20809.1517668868@minshall-apollo.minshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44046)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ei7JA-0002Cd-GF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 18:33:21 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ei7J7-0001k2-6w
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 18:33:20 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:53354)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1ei7J6-0001jl-WB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 18:33:17 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20809.1517668868@minshall-apollo.minshall.org> (Greg Minshall's
	message of "Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:41:08 +0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Greg Minshall <minshall@acm.org>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>

Greg Minshall <minshall@acm.org> writes:

>> Of course we do: just write 
>> 
>>   foocall<ZSWP>_foo()
>> 
>> or
>> 
>>   foocall_foo<ZSWP>()
>
> !!! :)
>
> (but, seems less intuitive.  maybe my math/CS brainwashing, liking to
> have lexical elements, etc.; that part of me would still vote for
> reverting.)

Hmmm, you may well be right. Fair enough. I reverted it.

Thank you.