From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates
 thru e.g. "<s[TAB]")
Date: Sat, 05 May 2018 19:33:02 +0200
Message-ID: <87sh7680tt.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <87lgd671k7.fsf@bzg.fr> <87o9i2p9qq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87k1sq6znz.fsf@bzg.fr> <87tvrteggu.fsf@norang.ca>
	<87lgd1erg5.fsf@norang.ca>
	<CADn3Z2+jatLYqoLMOJFW6vMDKkdiUEPDTb+4B63EkbS+g-zgOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1805030927460.17176@shell.miskatonic.org>
	<877eoj98nj.fsf@ossau.homelinux.net> <87lgczyid9.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAJcAo8vUeMZu+avUJ6Q2pvSnHmwqE2WR5T8eKjUFLDwOOOefvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87in827sov.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55293)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1fF17Z-0007pA-IN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 13:37:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1fF17W-0002W9-CU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 13:37:21 -0400
Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=34579 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1fF17W-0002V2-6j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 13:37:18 -0400
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1fF15N-0007xg-00
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 19:35:04 +0200
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com> writes:

> won't that conflict with the key binding for block editing mode?

Isn’t that "C-’".  Blocks are "C-c C-,".  I used some program to scavenge
for unused bindings in, I think, December last year and we discussed it on
the list.  I think the main contenders were "C-c C-." and "C-c C-," and
the latter is a bit nicer on my keyboard layout...
 
I might be have misunderstood something, if so I apologize.

> Also, I think C-c , is possibly more in-line with other
> template/expansion commands in other modes.

Don’t know.  Why?

Rasmus

-- 
Er du tosset for noge' lårt!