From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [ANN] Changes to link syntax
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:35:10 +0100
Message-ID: <87sgvtqsht.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87sgvusl43.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<3cac7a28-47ce-3e07-9c5b-282fd9761ef9@grinta.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56505)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1h3NtU-00081A-PR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:35:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1h3NtU-0004cO-33
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:35:16 -0400
Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:55401)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1h3NtT-0004Zt-RN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:35:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3cac7a28-47ce-3e07-9c5b-282fd9761ef9@grinta.net> (Daniele
	Nicolodi's message of "Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:00:11 -0600")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Daniele Nicolodi <daniele@grinta.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Daniele Nicolodi <daniele@grinta.net> writes:

> On 10/03/2019 11:19, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>     When in doubt, use the function ~org-link-escape~ in order to turn
>>     a link string into its properly escaped form.
>> 
>>     The old ~org-link-escape~ and ~org-link-unescape~ functions have
>>     been renamed into ~org-link-encode~ and ~org-link-decode~.
>
> Aren't those two sentences slightly contradictory? If ~org-link-escape~
> has been renamed ~org-link-encode~ I think that the later should be
> mentioned in the first sentence.

The first paragraph is about the new `org-link-escape'. The second one
is about the old `org-link-escape', which has become `org-link-encode'.
Is that clearer?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou