From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Documentation: Side effects of org-entry-properties and others
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 01:53:12 +0100
Message-ID: <87sgj8ogw7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <90aecaeb-c182-cc2e-9f31-4dc24db65af9@posteo.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42921)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1j3r8Y-0005YI-27
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:53:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1j3r8W-00059Z-OL
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:53:17 -0500
Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:57173)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
 id 1j3r8W-00057h-Ir
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:53:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <90aecaeb-c182-cc2e-9f31-4dc24db65af9@posteo.net> (D.'s message
 of "Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:19:46 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: D <d.williams@posteo.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

D <d.williams@posteo.net> writes:

> The same is true for org-element-lineage, but I am not so sure whether
> it is intended for hacking purposes as much as org-entry-properties.
> Sadly, I have no overview over the scope of this issue, so I do not know
> whether my suggestion is unrealistic (for example, because it would mean
> adding warnings practically everywhere).

I think this is unrealistic. If you need to save match data, execute
non-trivial code, and use the saved match data, I suggest to use
`save-match-data'.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou