emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: "Juan Manuel Macías" <maciaschain@posteo.net>,
	orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Possibility of using alternative separators in macros
Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 12:04:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sg36u5wa.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o8duyhxr.fsf@bzg.fr> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 01 May 2021 10:30:40 +0200")


Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> thank you for the patch.  I understand the general idea, but I think
> we should be careful not to overload the macro syntax - escaping the
> coma seems okay to me.  I'm closing this suggestion.
> I'm cc'ing Nicolas: if he thinks it's a useful addition, I won't of
> course insist on rejecting it.

This is a followup to a previous discussion in this mailing list, in
which Juan Manuel explained his use-case for a different argument
separator in macros. I noticed then that there was an opening for
a backward compatible syntax extension for it. As I was also not certain
it would be a good idea overall, I suggested him to start a new, more
visible, thread with the proposal, and collect feedback.

So, maybe it is a bit early to close it.

BTW, I would like to amend the proposed syntax, so as to limit friction
with the rest of Org. What would be more reasonable is the following:


where · is either nothing or a _single_ printable non-alphanumeric
non-space non-parenthesis character that isn't already meaningful in
Org. For example, if for some reason, we limit ourselves to ASCII
characters only, the set of allowed separators would be:

                       !   %   &   ,   ;   ?   `

So, again, I'm not saying we should do this. TBH, I'm not convinced by
the idea of duplicate syntax (comma-escaping and alternate characters)
for the same thing. But hard-core macro users may have a word to say
about it.


Nicolas Goaziou

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-01 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-30 13:26 Juan Manuel Macías
2021-05-01  8:30 ` Bastien
2021-05-01 10:04   ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2021-05-01 10:17     ` Bastien
2021-05-01 10:18     ` Bastien
2021-05-01 21:50     ` Juan Manuel Macías
2021-05-02 21:08       ` Christian Moe
2021-05-12 11:49         ` Maxim Nikulin
2021-05-16 19:21           ` Christian Moe
2021-05-17 17:03             ` Maxim Nikulin
2021-05-17 18:51               ` Christian Moe
2021-05-02 12:13     ` Eric S Fraga
2021-05-11 11:01 ` Eric S Fraga
2021-05-11 16:12   ` Juan Manuel Macías
     [not found]     ` <87im3prvz8.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
2021-05-11 18:25       ` Juan Manuel Macías
2021-05-15 13:29         ` Bastien
2021-05-15 20:14           ` Juan Manuel Macías
2021-05-15 20:25             ` Bastien
2021-05-15 21:05               ` Juan Manuel Macías
2021-05-16 12:17                 ` Bastien
2021-05-16 16:48                   ` Maxim Nikulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sg36u5wa.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --to=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --cc=bzg@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=maciaschain@posteo.net \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] Possibility of using alternative separators in macros' \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).