From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Griswold <dgriswol@rochester.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Agenda dispatcher changes files
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:09:58 -0500
Message-ID: <87r62jibyh.fsf@cantor.griswold.home>
References: <87r62jsjrg.fsf@cantor.griswold.home>
	<0AD25C50-4690-4A94-8911-9F7FDAD1E44B@uva.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LTKI6-0001ix-Qx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:10:02 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LTKI5-0001iV-9i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:10:02 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37266 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTKI5-0001iQ-58
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:10:01 -0500
Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.125]:39517)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dan@rochester.rr.com>) id 1LTKI4-0003TG-S4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:10:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <0AD25C50-4690-4A94-8911-9F7FDAD1E44B@uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's
	message of "Sat\, 31 Jan 2009 17\:32\:42 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:

> Hi Dan,
>
> If you want to help, the way to do it is to construct a minimal
> example, a testfile with minimal Org customization that can reliably
> reproduce this problem.  I am sure  that I can then easily find the
> bug and resolve it.
>
> - Carsten

Thank you, Carsten. Taking your suggestion, I may have narrowed down
the problem.

I started out using a minimal org file with these contents:

* Big item
** MAYBE Subitem
** TODO Another subitem
* Another one
** INPROCESS do something
   SCHEDULED: <2008-01-30 Wed +1w>
** TODO do something else
   SCHEDULED: <2009-01-31 Sat>

Executing C-c a a would NOT mark the file as changed.

However, once I added this:

#+TAGS: @COMPUTER(c) @PHONE(f)

and gave the tag "@COMPUTER:" to the "do something" line, then C-c a a
would mark the file as changed.

Please let me know if you need more testing, or values for other
variables.

Cheers,

Dan