From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: BUG-#+ Fontification Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:01:45 -0400 Message-ID: <87r5y825nq.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> References: <87octd2cql.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <751104C9-F496-4C28-AC3A-62E808444651@gmail.com> <87bppc3no1.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <877i003nm4.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <87zlcw281l.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <14307.1243550041@alphaville.usa.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9obi-0002x5-EI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:01:54 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9obe-0002wb-36 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:01:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42273 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M9obd-0002wY-TV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:01:49 -0400 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:61294) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9obd-0008Ns-EY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:01:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <14307.1243550041@alphaville.usa.hp.com> (Nick Dokos's message of "Thu\, 28 May 2009 18\:34\:01 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Nick Dokos writes: > It *is* initialized: > > ,---- > | (defface org-meta-line > | (org-compatible-face 'font-lock-comment-face nil) <-------- > | "Face for meta lines startin with \"#+\"." > | :group 'org-faces > | :version "22.1") > `---- > > It should look like a comment - but you may have defined the face > somehow and the macrology might be incapable of redefining it. Have you > tried restarting emacs? Btw this is the first time I've every messed with face colouring in emacs. I've always just used the default settings before since they were fine. -Bernt