From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Patch for windowing problem Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:53:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87r5weqsm5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <4A5F8060.3060607@sift.info> <87k5281a7r.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A5FC780.5020909@sift.info> <87iqhrlp6o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A60737E.3080600@sift.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MS5gE-0007XH-DP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:54:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MS5g9-0007Wg-Fe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:54:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54547 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MS5g9-0007WX-99 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:54:01 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.249]:36060) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MS5g8-0002U4-SS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:54:01 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so525740rvb.6 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:53:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A60737E.3080600@sift.info> (Robert Goldman's message of "Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:50:06 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Robert Goldman Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Robert, Robert Goldman writes: > If you are inclined, you should be able to run with this patch, and it > should do /absolutely nothing/. That would be a good test, too. If you > plug it in, and you use only a single frame, org-mode should not change > at all for you. If it does, you have performed the valuable service of > finding that I have made a big bug! I've been trying to use frames with Org and Org-remember. I can't reproduce the bug you are reporting, so maybe it's an Aquamacs bug? Does anyone using frames in GNU Emacs can reproduce Robert's bug? -- Bastien