From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mead Subject: Re: Proposed key binding changes: archiving and attachments Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:24:26 +0000 Message-ID: <87r5s8vpr9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20091106134034.GA7997@taupan.ath.cx> <6ac505ad0911061711j9fcc5en4dc4b2e013c5f68e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7CRH-0007LT-Me for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:24:35 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7CRB-0007KC-PF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:24:34 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35407 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7CRB-0007K9-Ih for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:24:29 -0500 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.149]:2462) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7CRB-0002Q5-0K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:24:29 -0500 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 3so563221eyh.34 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:24:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:33:30 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > I actually think that few people use archiving to sibling. Am I wrong about > this? I use archiving to sibling for sub-headings in projects that are still current, to tidy things up, then archive the whole project subtree to the archive file when it's finished. I'd prefer to have archive to sibling as the default option with the fewest keystrokes. (FWIW!) Paul