From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz?= Stelmach Subject: Re: fractional hours for timestamps? Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:43:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87r5i2kfv1.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> References: <87bp974wng.fsf@gnu.org> <87d3tn1yil.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> <87vd7erk6f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38275 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OjqnO-0007LA-CC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 05:43:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjqnM-00005O-Qg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 05:43:26 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjqnM-000059-Hb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 05:43:24 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjqnK-0001TQ-Q6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:43:22 +0200 Received: from dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.147.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:43:22 +0200 Received: from lukasz.stelmach by dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:43:22 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Łukasz Stelmach writes: > >> I think Greg's point is about entering data using only numeric keypad. I >> can confirm that I have considered these issues (esp. 1400 >> vs. 14:00). Fractional hours don't seem to be that easy as there are >> countries like Poland where you use comma as decimal point (working with >> Emacs' built in calc is a pain) which earns another few lines for >> parsing code. > > AFAIC, I won't mess with this part of the code, I think it's quite easy > enough to enter 14:00 instead of 1400... Not really in fact if you use keypad. It's not about the number of keystrokes but their layout. Try it. > patch welcome ;) ASAP ;) -- Miłego dnia, Łukasz Stelmach