From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: suggestion: simplify depth stepping of document structure (outline) visibility Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:26:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87r5hbvcqy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4AB0000D.5000004@alumni.ethz.ch> <4AB00E6F.4090501@alumni.ethz.ch> <873a6nlopp.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <4AD5C312.7010703@alumni.ethz.ch> <4C7E8909.9040504@alumni.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37308 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrL2k-0006Ev-AJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:26:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrL2j-0000E9-1A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:26:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:56759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrL2i-0000Dy-TP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:26:13 -0400 Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so1150360wyb.0 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:26:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C7E8909.9040504@alumni.ethz.ch> (Michael Brand's message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:10:33 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Michael Brand Cc: rainer.stengele@diplan.de, hsitz@nwlink.com, Org Mode Hi Michael, Michael Brand writes: > Now I did a rewrite for some improvements, mainly to support dive in > and out of headings also in a variant that leaves the visibility of > siblings. The code is at the end. It tested the code, works nicely - thanks! I just noticed two oddities: (1) it has no notion of content, it's just about headlines, right? Okay, I can always combine `C->' with the usual TAB command but it's a bit surprising first; (2) the first press at C-> and C-< sets the "content relative view" to 1, whatever the initial state was. Feels a bit unintuitive to me... Hope others will test this! -- Bastien