From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Re: [Bug] Level 2 text not exported in LaTeX (well in HTML) + some comments Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:31:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87r5gl79de.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> References: <87ocdzw7gq.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <43BA920D-4EA2-4C51-B941-33A60D097EB3@gmail.com> <87hbi6uprt.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87y6bhajrm.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87wrr1aexq.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <448D9DB2-71DE-4B9B-BF5B-B575735D794D@yahoo.com> <878w3dlbqy.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87hbhomsl5.fsf_-_@mundaneum.com> <8762y4jsm0.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87eicrorpr.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87fwx6hg5q.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87d3saozly.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87k4mdo7gr.fsf@mundaneum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44470 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyWvJ-0002xN-HS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:32:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyWvH-0001sl-8Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:32:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:53273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyWvH-0001sf-1l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:32:15 -0400 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so1081961wwb.30 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:32:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k4mdo7gr.fsf@mundaneum.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbg==?= Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, >>>>> Sébastien Vauban writes: > And, in the case that such a construct would not be used, I wouldn't > mind having to manually indent the paragraph where I want to place > it, as long as the indentation is used to decide to what the text > must be attached to. Please (re-)read my "rhetorical" questions: this is not as simple as it sounds. > (thinking at backward-compatibility solution) I have to disagree here, as those constructs were only partly recognized (and partly broken): again, LaTeX exporter and auto-indentation weren't aware about them. Anyway, before thinking at backward-compatibility, the design should be fixed first. Now, on the other hand, there's Carsten's "ASCII duck head" idea... Well, I still can't help thinking those constructs are ill-defined and can be avoided by reorganizing the list, or using headings. Even those do not support such constructs, for a good reason. Regards, -- Nicolas