From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: eval: Invalid read syntax: "#"Error during redisplay: (void-function -mode) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:04:29 -0500 Message-ID: <87r5dow5hu.fsf@norang.ca> References: <26374.1292004951@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4A9A4769-88C0-4FB3-8D94-17ED3C2DAC81@tsdye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45761 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PRTox-0001jB-IM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:05:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PRToG-0007Ul-Nq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:04:42 -0500 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:41373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PRToG-0007T3-M0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:04:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4A9A4769-88C0-4FB3-8D94-17ED3C2DAC81@tsdye.com> (Thomas S. Dye's message of "Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:27:51 -1000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode list "Thomas S. Dye" writes: > So, Seb and I have two things that others can't reproduce: the error > in the OP, and the version string for the latest Org-mode. > >>> >>> I'm using Org-mode version 7.3 (release_7.4.2.g32f816.dirty) >>> >> >> >> FWIW, I cannot reproduce it: >> >> GNU Emacs 23.2.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.14.4) of >> 2010-10-27 on gamaville.dokosmarshall.org >> Org-mode version 7.4 (release_7.4.5.gb0844.dirty) The version string problem is reproducible. At commit 32f816 (2 commits after the release_7.4 tag) the version number is 7.3 even though it is after the release_7.4 tag. In b0844 (5 commits after the release_7.4 tag) this problem has been fixed which is why Nick doesn't see it. HTH, Bernt