From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Dunsmore <emacs-orgmode@dunsmor.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: Refile sometimes loses the last line [7.7
 (release_7.7.15.gc363)]
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:35:24 -0500
Message-ID: <87r5519rdf.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
References: <8762mh69yj.fsf@norang.ca> <8762meedru.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
	<87y5zarmab.fsf@norang.ca> <877h6ti839.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34246)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jason@dunsmor.com>) id 1Qoz1D-0007kV-E2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:35:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jason@dunsmor.com>) id 1Qoz1C-0000J3-Ar
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:35:27 -0400
Received: from deathroller.dunsmor.com ([98.129.169.48]:43661)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jason@dunsmor.com>) id 1Qoz1C-0000Ix-5m
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:35:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <877h6ti839.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> (David Maus's message of "Thu, 04
	Aug 2011 16:07:06 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Cc: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi David,

> I just pushed a simplified version of the solution: No need to count
> lines, just check if point is at end of buffer.

I just tried out your patch.  The logic in your patch is slightly
different - it checks if the point is at the end of the last line in the
buffer, whereas mine checks if the point is anywhere on the last line.
I don't think it fixes the problem.  Bernt, can you test it?

Thanks,
Jason