From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Missing header line in export of tables that contain "special marking characters" Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:19:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87r4wf15ed.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47605) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCGND-0004f1-OP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:18:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCGNB-00008n-Ou for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:18:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:33815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCGNB-000085-Fh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:18:37 -0400 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so3690503wib.12 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:18:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (William Henney's message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:41:07 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: William Henney Cc: emacs-org Hi William, William Henney writes: > When I export a table that uses `!' in the first column to denote the > column names, then the header line does not appear in the exported > file (ascii, html, or latex). Please see the attached example org > file and html output. Is this behavior intentional? Yes, this is intentional. See the docstring of `org-export-table-remove-special-lines': Remove special lines and marking characters in calculating tables. This removes the special marking character column from tables that are set up for spreadsheet calculations. It also removes the entire lines marked with `!', `_', or `^'. The lines with `$' are kept, because the values of constants may be useful to have. > Can it be turned off? I tried to add a new option for this, but the option would be a bit confusing, and the cost of having it seems to high, considered how simple the workaround is. Hope you can live with it! -- Bastien