From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: #+ATTR_HTML ineffetive in recent org_mode?
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:03:07 +0200
Message-ID: <87r4we3zvo.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAN_Dec_jd4A0SN0RRbwfn43SqX_ohTcQ7+u3RC3Tbas3+vYeGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57846)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>)
	id 1SCWyC-0005my-Av
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:02:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1SCWy5-0003iR-GS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:01:55 -0400
Received: from incoming2.cnam.fr ([163.173.128.34]:62013)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>)
	id 1SCWy5-0003hs-Am
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:01:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAN_Dec_jd4A0SN0RRbwfn43SqX_ohTcQ7+u3RC3Tbas3+vYeGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Matt Price's message of "Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:49:20 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Matt,

Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com> writes:

> I pulled from git yesterday and am having trouble with #+ATTR_HTML in
> html export -- from what I cna tell, the #+ATTR_HTML: lines are just
> being ignored.  Has anyone else seen this? 

I can't reproduce this, sorry.

-- 
 Bastien