From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: Erroneous "No such file or directory" with babel and remote dir Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:22:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87r4pnpehe.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <87y5kiq71h.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87vcfapgfy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87a9wd56i6.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <878vbwhczx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87a9wc1uki.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87vcf0ft1s.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87mx0chswg.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THHno-0004M6-CW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:23:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THHnk-0004Sl-7h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:23:08 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THHnk-0004Sd-17 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:23:04 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1THHnn-0002qU-R5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:23:07 +0200 Received: from pd9eb3a7a.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.235.58.122]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:23:07 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb3a7a.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:23:07 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Loris Bennett writes: > OK, I must have goofed. What I did after starting the bisection was > > - run 'make autoload' > - open test file in emacs with minimal .emacs > - test > - end emacs > - mark bisection good or bad > > I then repeated this for the next commit. This would be the correct thing to do, yes. > Is something missing here, or did I just incorrectly mark a commit? I really don't know, I'm just guessing… :-) It may be more informative if you traced the invocation of the remote execution in both a failing and a working version in the debugger and look for any differences as the arguments are cobbled together. Once you find where an how these diverge it would be much easier to find the code that is responsible for it (if it wasn't glaringly obvious from the trace already). Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds