From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Sexp aganda entries broken? Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:24:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87r4o1bf3y.fsf@gmail.com> References: <50998D60.300@gmx.de> <509DA8C2.9000502@gmx.de> <87ehk1da0y.fsf@gmail.com> <509E8A5F.3080403@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXDvP-0007pD-QU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:28:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXDvM-0003S3-Nx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:28:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <509E8A5F.3080403@gmx.de> (Simon Thum's message of "Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:09:51 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Simon Thum Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode Simon Thum writes: > I know that, but I deemed it useful to document it as a related but > separate mechanism on its own merit. Perhaps there could be a link to > 10.3.1 to make it clear that the notations differ in important ways? Since %%(...) syntax isn't a timestamp /per se/, there is no reason to refer to it in the timestamps part of the manual. Also, despite its own merit, it's an antiquated[fn:1] and irregular syntax, which doesn't deserve much publicity. It won't disappear, but it's better to circumvent its uses. Regards, [fn:1] Even the example given in "Calendar/Diary integration" section is outdated, as it relies on CATEGORY keyword to change category on the fly within the same section (see footnote in 10.4.1). -- Nicolas Goaziou