From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Worg FAQ typo
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:22:22 +0100
Message-ID: <87r4lc11bl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <86fw1y2qjf.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43908)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Ty0Hc-0005UT-Ot
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:22:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Ty0HZ-00026X-0L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:22:28 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:58414)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Ty0HY-00026K-Py
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:22:24 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hn14so703755wib.9
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:22:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <86fw1y2qjf.fsf@gmail.com> (David Rogers's message of "Fri, 18
	Jan 2013 12:18:44 -0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Rogers <davidandrewrogers@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi David,

David Rogers <davidandrewrogers@gmail.com> writes:

> The second example at
>
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#org-class
>
> is not correct as shown.
>
> It appears to me that it is only missing the < and > signs in the
> appropriate places, but I can't be sure. When I add those signs then the
> example seems to work for me. I'd appreciate it if someone who knows
> better could confirm that that's all it needs.

I confirm, fixed in Worg, thanks!

-- 
 Bastien