From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: Web site generator, but not so static Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:23:29 -0600 Message-ID: <87r4ifcqzt.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQmeJ-0001WD-Oj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:40:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQmeI-00089n-KS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:40:51 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]:52787) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQmeI-00089C-21 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:40:50 -0400 Received: by mail-da0-f43.google.com with SMTP id u36so1314450dak.2 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:40:49 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Fabrice Popineau writes: > I'm considering waht most benefit could be drawn from > coupling org-mode to write web pages (skeletons) > and hunchentoot (common lisp web server). > > There used to be some starter for a CL Org-mode parser, but it > seems to be dead by now. > > There are several ways in which the pair could make sense. > For example by using slime to feed directly data to the server. > Also by the fact that org-mode in emacs could easily spit out > sexp rather than html. > > Did anybody look into this ? If an Emacs-Lisp web server would work, maybe this could be of use. https://github.com/eschulte/org-ehtml -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte