From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: [RFC] Move ox-koma-letter into core? Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:38:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87r482wo2k.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <878uueciku.fsf@gmail.com> <55F46D73-2430-4831-ABE9-D66AE03647E7@gmail.com> <874n50cdnu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwisrrv8.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k3dwaw98.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46839) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5IoV-0002BU-Aa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:39:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5IoO-0002bq-GX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:39:07 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39659) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5IoO-0002bk-9l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:39:00 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W5IoJ-0004rW-9D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:38:55 +0100 Received: from pd9eb3888.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.235.56.136]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:38:55 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb3888.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:38:55 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: >> The first question is what do we want contrib to be? > > So let's start with this one. […] You didn't answer the question of what you want contrib to be or I'm too dense to find where. You keep talking about an Org ELPA that doesn't exist and about your expectation of unspecified advantages that this might have. Again, please clearly state what you want this to be as well as why and how it is better than what we have now. >> If you are suggesting to remove the history of contrib from Org's repo, >> then I'm against it. > > Why? For starters, that would require everyone maintaining their own branches to also migrate (or abandon) them. You'd need a _really_ good reason to do this and so far I see none. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf microQ V2.22R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada