From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:46:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87r47i2e9b.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87txf1xrnr.fsf@gmx.us> <8761ph8e38.fsf@gmx.us> <87ppnpuuuf.fsf@gmail.com> <871u058502.fsf@gmx.us> <878uudukcs.fsf@gmail.com> <87bnz0jhv3.fsf@gmx.us> <877g9nvh6j.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjm6z59a.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxBb-0000M4-EQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:46:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxBV-0004J5-9Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:46:19 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]:33522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxBV-0004Hd-2N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:46:13 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q59so18147wes.34 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 23:46:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zjm6z59a.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Wed, 05 Feb 2014 03:02:09 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Rasmus writes: > Given that other groups are org-latex and > org-html etc., should the group not be called org-koma-letter? No. Other groups are `org-export-latex', `org-export-html'... Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou