From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: emails written in Org Mode Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 02:57:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87r41nh20m.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r41uwdiy.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu> <87pph8n40m.fsf@quasar.esben-stien.name> <87mwcckqru.fsf@quasar.esben-stien.name> <87mwcb36aj.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu> <874myjqwqn.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56013) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6r4H-0002Gr-BN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 20:58:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6r4B-0003gZ-Ri for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 20:58:05 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6r4B-0003ft-L7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 20:57:59 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X6r4A-0002KF-Cs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 02:57:58 +0200 Received: from e178063138.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.63.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 02:57:58 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by e178063138.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 02:57:58 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Abrahamsen writes: > John Kitchin writes: > >> I usually do this kind of tracking with a link to the email instead. It >> is not automated communication between email and org, and it is not that >> complicated, but it does what I need, when I need it. > > I will stop with shameless plugs at some point here, but this is exactly > what Gnorb does ... Why? Nothing more frustrating than implementing a *brandnew* idea only to find out later on that idea & implementation already existed. I would not call this 'shameless plugs' but rather necessary and useful library advertising, but maybe I'm biased since I tend to do the same thing ;) PS Hadn't have the time to try Gnorb, but the combination of gnus&org is definitely interesting for me. -- cheers, Thorsten