Hi,

Now odt output doesn't look ugly.  I fixed the other things you
mentioned.  Make test passes.


Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

>> But we are not checking that :CUSTOM_ID is unique.
>
> This is not our problem, but user's.
>
>> In ox-latex you're required to turn on a variable on to get this
>> behavior (I could be mistaken here). For now I have done as you
>> suggest. But I don't understand why we are favoring CUSTOM_ID here
>> over the nice, unique label we've generated?
>
> We could do the same as ox-latex, default to generated label, and
> optionally allow users to use raw custom-id instead (with usual caveat).
>
> Meanwhile, I think it is reasonable to stick to the current behaviour.


Fine with me.  Maybe some other day. . .

> I don't get your point. (cons 'a (list 'b)) is equivalent to (list 'a
> 'b). Why do you think this changes the data structure?

Right.  No point. 

>   (org-some (lambda (h) ...)
>             (cons headline (org-export-get-genealogy headline)))
>
> is more elegant.

That's true.


> I suggest to also test tricky inherited UNNUMBERED properties

Added.

—Rasmus

-- 
Vote for proprietary math!