From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Can special blocks be nested?
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 23:16:08 +0100
Message-ID: <87r3wnnf87.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87h9xljd1m.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59066)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XuTp2-0004zW-Rs
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 17:15:36 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XuTou-00030H-TS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 17:15:28 -0500
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:38625)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XuTou-0002zs-N9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 17:15:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87h9xljd1m.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of
	"Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:52:21 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
Cc: Org-Mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes:

> this seems to work when exporting:
>
> #+BEGIN_BLOCK1
> Lorem ipsum
> #+BEGIN_BLOCK2
> dolor sit amet
> #+END_BLOCK2
> #+END_BLOCK1
>
> but font locking does not (the inner block begin/end markers are not
> colorized properly).
>
> Is this construction legal?

It is legal. You can nest special blocks, as long as they don't have the
same type.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou