From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: C-x RET r utf-8 RET Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:00:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87r3wa8qt8.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> References: <87d27uzn8g.fsf@skimble.plus.com> <87iohm1tnf.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XxuB1-0006OF-QQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 04:00:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XxuAv-0007Bf-NO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 04:00:19 -0500 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:43204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XxuAv-0007AW-HR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 04:00:13 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CD0190E43 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:00:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E2fNJi0moyLz for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:00:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (117-116.echostar.pl [213.156.117.116]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BBEB190895 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:00:11 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <87iohm1tnf.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2014-12-08, at 08:35, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > [...] You could do that in a lambda, but > it probably won't accept a non-interactive function, [...] Out of curiosity: can't a lambda (in e.g. global-set-key) be made interactive? I did this right now: (global-set-key (kbd "C-z C-s") (lambda () (interactive) (message "It can be done!"))) and it seems to work. Is it going to change e.g. in future Emacs versions, IOW, is it deprecated or something? > Yours, > Eric Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University