From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: [ANN] [OT] New Android app (Orgzly) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:05:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87r3ulgi0i.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> References: <87lhkvm4nb.fsf@orgzly.com> <87fvb222ft.fsf@gnu.org> <87a91aiie1.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87mw5abfhg.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEoEV-0008O0-Cn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:05:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEoES-000199-4S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:05:47 -0500 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:54573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEoER-000193-Ti for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:05:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506124AC58 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:05:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qsRr3YnkMsRo for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:05:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (117-116.echostar.pl [213.156.117.116]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4F7C4AC4F for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:05:42 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <87mw5abfhg.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2015-01-22, at 23:46, Rasmus wrote: > Fine with me! > > Neven, whom I have exchange a couple of private emails with, is free to > distribute his software as he see fit. What I explicitly quoted as bei= ng > uncomfortable was the association between his product with *org-mode*. > Note, the tag-line on Neven's site was something like "org-mode for > Android" up until this discussion. Did not know that; sorry for not doing my homework. Of course, calling this "org-mode for Android" or similarly *is* unacceptable, for obvious reasons. > I'm sure everybody is excited that his program is working with the *org > format*! Apparently, not everybody. But not everybody has to, of course. >> Then others come and say some, ekhm, not-extremely-nice things to >> someone who was definitely not trolling or anything like this. > > We should strive to keep the org-list friendly and civilized. That's what I'm saying (see also my response to the Greg's email). >> Let us further assume that he will sell his book in bookstores (it mig= ht >> be in ebook form, with or without DRM, or in paper form - never mind, = I >> do not know the exact details). Would he be prohibited from mentionin= g >> his project (which clearly involves a non-free piece of *software*, >> i.e., the LaTeX source file, and promotes the *result* of executing th= is >> piece of code) on Emacs mailing list? I am very interested in a serio= us >> answer, and (if it happens to be "no") in explanation how and why the >> situation would be different. > > First, I don't have strong opinions on this. However, as I recall ther= e's > a passage on articles vs software in Free as in Freedom 2.0: > > http://shop.fsf.org/product/free-as-in-freedom-2/ TL;DR, sorry - it is several hundred pages long, and I have a huge backlog of books (technical, non-fiction and fiction). I might add this to the list. > =E2=80=94Rasmus Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University