From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Bleeding edge in elpa Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:59:23 -0400 Message-ID: <87r3svi9us.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: <87y4n4l1bj.fsf@gmail.com> <8761a7ibre.fsf@jack.tftorrey.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVmn6-0001BE-BK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:59:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVmmy-0007KC-Fg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:59:40 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVmmy-0007K8-4M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:59:32 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YVmmv-0005xU-Vi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:59:30 +0100 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:59:29 +0100 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:59:29 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org tftorrey@tftorrey.com (T.F. Torrey) writes: > Aaron Ecay writes: > ... >> Exposing new users to the vagaries of the master branch may rather lead >> to atheism. > > This sounds like the foot-shooting argument again. Could one not just > as easily harm one's foot with the master version from git? Or is the > assumption that only git users are smart enough to wield the power? > Maybe Org is so powerful that it should not be released via by ELPA at > all, for the sake of everyone's appendages. > I took Aaaron's comment to mean that most users would be happier *not* using the master branch (however obtained), relying instead on the maint branch. Nick