From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Why not push? Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 08:21:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3nife7g.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87h9unwk0r.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87y4hq38po.fsf@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMs35-0005Ng-MH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 02:19:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMs34-000228-Rz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 02:19:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y4hq38po.fsf@free.fr> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Wed, 05 Aug 2015 02:00:35 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Guerry Cc: Org-Mode mailing list , Marcin Borkowski Hello, Bastien Guerry writes: > I pushed a tiny clean up here. Next question is: why not using > > (split-string STRING SEPARATORS t) > > ? It's a first step. It would be nice to get rid of `org-split-string' altogether in the long run. We may make `org-split-string' an obsolete alias for `split-string', and update code base accordingly. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou