From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Loury Subject: Re: Help with export filter? Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:54:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3n8mub5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8761ir0yvw.fsf@gmx.us> <878u9gd42g.fsf@gmail.com> <87vbck62n0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tws4mvad.fsf@gmail.com> <87r3n8600e.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPXPy-0001jw-LT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:54:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPXPv-0002aw-Gd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:54:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:34025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPXPu-0002ac-UD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:54:11 -0400 Received: by wicne3 with SMTP id ne3so221908506wic.1 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 07:54:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r3n8600e.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Samuel Loury writes: > >> I find the solution with the code of Thomas S. Dye very elegant: >> * My heading >> Some content with images. >> * My other heading, totally cleared :clearpage: >> some other content >> >> I hope I clarified the use and the what for. > > AFAICT, this is a very specific, cosmetic, feature targeting a single > family of export back-ends (i.e., LaTeX and derivatives). > > I see nothing wrong to letting users implement it themselves, as they > see fit (e.g., one could prefer using a less visible node property for > that). I agree with you. Thank you for taking the time to answer. =2D-=20 Konubinix GPG Key : 7439106A Fingerprint: 5993 BE7A DA65 E2D9 06CE 5C36 75D2 3CED 7439 106A --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVy14PAAoJEHXSPO10ORBqE7EIAKZF9KPAu3qS7PK4YUhqYwLI Uowgktz0Z7UH9lWzVq0XOoaU9rBfkCRPGZ2u2pEHMOfrxuk++yefXZOoq6wn5nkj HWpKV45c3pgMze8VxHX6Hj1A0L0Az9IWx45Un0G57u39cX9zb5uwVKgeMoOuX4mT 15ECvn/5swKmrp83vFIzPaxWugDaVE52SXEIdu9Ds1ShlVPb2n9EcIBthEOkJspD 5QWCt+aV+Oxj9qcCNoQ0N6pDlJCslZiLZqNJ5Q0mzG8AH1/19Xny+AxJwD7ux5oE kzFBo5SAjE14PaMaUKcXKxDr9zN9N8zsi4petOqAh5EaN3yK3Hp96gb8WM1+ZtQ= =3CSf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--